<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another security issue: key management</title>
	<link>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/09/24/yet-another-security-issue-key-management/</link>
	<description>What's going to go wrong in our e-enabled world?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 05:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/09/24/yet-another-security-issue-key-management/#comment-2796</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/09/24/yet-another-security-issue-key-management/#comment-2796</guid>
		<description>It's generally-accepted wisdom that, if the deployment of a crypto system fails, 90% of the time the issues which cause the failure are down to key management. Here at Sun, we've just incorporated a key management framework into the current (08/07) release of Solaris 10; as I know Nicko from way back and know that he talks a lot of good sense, I'd be interested to know what he makes of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s generally-accepted wisdom that, if the deployment of a crypto system fails, 90% of the time the issues which cause the failure are down to key management. Here at Sun, we&#8217;ve just incorporated a key management framework into the current (08/07) release of Solaris 10; as I know Nicko from way back and know that he talks a lot of good sense, I&#8217;d be interested to know what he makes of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.071 seconds -->
