<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Rights Conflict</title>
	<link>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/08/08/when-rights-conflict/</link>
	<description>What's going to go wrong in our e-enabled world?</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David French</title>
		<link>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/08/08/when-rights-conflict/#comment-1334</link>
		<dc:creator>David French</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 23:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/08/08/when-rights-conflict/#comment-1334</guid>
		<description>With local health authorities taking a generous approach to information sharing citing "common good" but more likely for administrative convenience (see Patients' privacy could be compromised by health b...), the opportunity to consider cases like the one presented will be swept aside.

My view ... 1. Yes  ; 2. No, not outside the individual patient - carer relationship ; 3. Probably, in a legal sense. This is a bad thing!  Genetic information is probably the ultimate in "identity" information; 4. The patient fully informed by consultant.

http://davethinkingaloud.blogspot.com/2007/08/health-information-privacy-when-rights.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With local health authorities taking a generous approach to information sharing citing &#8220;common good&#8221; but more likely for administrative convenience (see Patients&#8217; privacy could be compromised by health b&#8230;), the opportunity to consider cases like the one presented will be swept aside.</p>
<p>My view &#8230; 1. Yes  ; 2. No, not outside the individual patient - carer relationship ; 3. Probably, in a legal sense. This is a bad thing!  Genetic information is probably the ultimate in &#8220;identity&#8221; information; 4. The patient fully informed by consultant.</p>
<p><a href="http://davethinkingaloud.blogspot.com/2007/08/health-information-privacy-when-rights.html" rel="nofollow">http://davethinkingaloud.blogspot.com/2007/08/health-information-privacy-when-rights.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/08/08/when-rights-conflict/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 07:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blindside.org.uk/2007/08/08/when-rights-conflict/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>1. Yes
2. No
3. No
4. The patient</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Yes<br />
2. No<br />
3. No<br />
4. The patient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.122 seconds -->
