Data mining: let’s define it better

Posted by William Heath in Faster/smaller/better..., Murphy's Law, data mining, unexpected consequences at February 10th, 2007

With all the promise data mining holds for counterterrorism Congress is having a good look it, posts Jeff Jonas
.

This session again proved that what data mining means depends on whom you ask. And, as such, this poses a real problem for those trying to have a rational conversation on the subject. And I worry that if lawmakers get this wrong … poor laws will follow.

Like ID management, if we don’t start with clear definitions then we won’t understand what we’re talking about. Because we need to work out
- what is feasible
- what should we realistically expect
- what are the social consequences

Jonas lists several defiinitions from other data-mining submissions, and makes the point we need to settle on one if were going to regulate it.

There are no comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Contributors to the Blindside wiki and blog should note their input forms part of a collaborative resource that is Creative Commons (by-sa 2.5) licensed. We hope these resources will be reused and remixed in the public interest. You do not need to seek permission before you re-use our works, although we do require that users attribute Blindside as their source, and license the resulting work under the same terms.